The Council refused reconsideration. While the docket of the Judicial Council published before their session includes the substance of the requests for rulings, it does not include the requests for reconsideration there. Consequently, there is no knowing what issues were brought forward to be grounds for review of JCD 1259. Since the Council already ruled on the issue of conference liability in JCD 1261, reconsideration was moot . . . unless there is concern that the by-laws of Hope for the Future, Inc. really cross the line between the conference and the corporation. There is no question that the emergency under which Hope for the Future, Inc. was established led to short cuts that were not Disciplinary but both the annual conference and the Judicial Council tolerated that. As the Council warned in JCD 1261, the boundaries between the conference and the corporation will need to be watched carefully.